Isiotan v. Nielsen et al
| Wahab Babatunde Isiotan and Toyin Sote |
| Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle and Lee Cissna |
| 1:2018cv04460 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Wahab Babatunde Isiotan, Toyin Sote. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Byung J. Pak. (eop) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Jefferson Sessions. (eop) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kevin Riddle. (eop) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Cissna. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kirstjen Nielsen. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Wahab Babatunde Isiotan and Toyin Sote. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113E-8166301) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -1, #2 Exhibit -2, #3 Exhibit -3, #4 Exhibit -4, #5 Exhibit -5, #6 Exhibit -6, #7 Exhibit -7, #8 Exhibit -8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
