Moon v. MagneGas Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Henry Moon
Defendant: MagneGas Corporation and Ermanno Santilli
Case Number: 1:2018cv04462
Filed: September 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Michael L Brown
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(i). (jpa)
October 29, 2018 Civil Case Terminated. (jpa)
October 26, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed by Henry Moon (Heim, Magdalena)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER approving the parties' #10 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. The time limits for adding parties, amending the pleadings, filing motions, completing discovery, and discussing settlement are as set out in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 10/24/18. (ddm)
October 23, 2018 Filing 10 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Henry Moon. (Heim, Magdalena)
October 4, 2018 Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli. (Menendez, Kenneth)
October 4, 2018 Clerks Notation approving #9 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement. (bgt)
October 2, 2018 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Henry Moon. (Heim, Magdalena)
October 2, 2018 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons by Henry Moon. (Heim, Magdalena)
October 2, 2018 Clerks Notation approving #7 CIP/CDS (bgt)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER (by docket entry only) granting attorney William S. Gyves's #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Ordered by Judge Michael L. Brown on 10/2/2018. (bgt)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER (by docket entry only) granting attorney Glenn Graham's #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Ordered by Judge Michael L. Brown on 10/2/2018. (bgt)
October 2, 2018 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #4 APPLICATION for Admission of William S. Gyves Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8174901). Attorney William S. Gyves added appearing on behalf of MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli (pmb)
October 2, 2018 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Glenn Graham Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8174874). Attorney Glenn Graham added appearing on behalf of MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli (pmb)
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting Defendants' #5 Motion for Extension of Time, up to and including 11/12/2018, to respond to the verified complaint. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/28/2018. (bgt)
September 28, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Extending Time, #2 Affidavit Declaration of William S. Gyves in Support of Motion for Extension of Time)(Menendez, Kenneth)
September 27, 2018 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Admission of William S. Gyves Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8174901)by MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli. (Menendez, Kenneth)
September 27, 2018 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of Glenn Graham Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8174874)by MagneGas Corporation, Ermanno Santilli. (Menendez, Kenneth)
September 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/25/18. (jpa)
September 24, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by MagneGas Corporation and Ermanno Santilli. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113E-8165555) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit -B - Notice of Filing, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moon v. MagneGas Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Moon
Represented By: Edwin Jay Schklar
Represented By: Magdalena Maria Heim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MagneGas Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth G. Menendez
Represented By: Glenn Graham
Represented By: William S. Gyves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ermanno Santilli
Represented By: Kenneth G. Menendez
Represented By: Glenn Graham
Represented By: William S. Gyves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?