Ortiz v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Jim Daniel Ortiz |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2018cv04476 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Steve C Jones |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Commissioner, Social Security Administration answer due 1/22/2019. (rjs) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Jim Daniel Ortiz. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 10/11/2018, answer due 1/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts)(Flynn, Kathleen) Modified on 10/31/2018 to correct answer date (rjs). |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Kenneth R. Hiller. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 10/16/18. (ddm)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Kenneth R. Hiller Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8185219). Attorney Kenneth R. Hiller added appearing on behalf of Jim Daniel Ortiz (pmb) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Kenneth R. Hiller Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8185219)by Jim Daniel Ortiz. (Flynn, Kathleen) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and Attorney General. (btql) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Jim Daniel Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(btql) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Counsel for Plaintiff is appointed to effect service of process upon Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/26/2018. (btql)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (eop) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Jim Daniel Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit -A, #3 Exhibit -B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summon(s) -3)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jim Daniel Ortiz | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Marie Flynn |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R. Hiller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
