Newell v. United States of America
Carlos Newell |
Jeff Sessions and United States of America |
1:2018cv04499 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Orinda D Evans |
Janet F King |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER recharacterizing the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as a 2255 Motion to Vacate and DIRECTING the Clerk to file a copy in 1:16-CR-0360-ODE-JFK-1 and to adjust the Court's docket to show that the instant civil action is a motion to vacate. All further proceedings shall be filed and maintained in 1:16-CR-0360. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King on 10/2/18. (jkl) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailingto Carlos Newell re #2 Order. (jkl) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Review, to District Judge Orinda D. Evans. (eop) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. (eop) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus construed by the Court as a 2255 Motion to Vacate filed by Carlos Newell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 10/2/2018 (jkl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.