Nadel v. United States of America
| Brett Nadel |
| United States of America |
| 1:2018cv04510 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE Of Filing of Judicial Notice of Facts by Brett Nadel. (bnw) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered DISMISSING action for lack of jurisdiction. (jlm)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4
ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's #2 Final Report and Recommendation and DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 11/5/18. (jlm)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (jlm) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brett Nadel re #5 Clerk's Judgment, #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (jlm) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brett Nadel, to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr.. (jlm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/5/18. (jlm)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending dismissing #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brett Nadel for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/5/18. (jlm) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brett Nadel re #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brett Nadel. Notice of street name change for the Atlanta courthouse included. (jlm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Brett Nadel. ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 106451.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Submission for Frivolity re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nadel v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brett Nadel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
