Smith v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Bobby Ray Smith |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Medical Data Systems, Inc. (Florida) |
| 1:2018cv04534 |
| September 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Steve C Jones |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bobby Ray Smith. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. waiver mailed on 10/2/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Klein, Adam) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bobby Ray Smith. Medical Data Systems, Inc. (Florida) waiver mailed on 10/2/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Klein, Adam) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Bobby Ray Smith. (Klein, Adam) |
| Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons--Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 10/1/18. (cp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Bobby Ray Smith. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8176064) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
