Waters et al v. Smith
| Alvin Waters and Calvin Waters |
| Patrick Michael Smith |
| 1:2018cv04750 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| William M Ray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Reassigned to Judge William M Ray, II. Judge Leigh Martin May no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:18-cv-04750-WMR. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (btql) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 10/17/2018. (btql)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Patrick Michael Smith. (bnw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Alvin Waters, Calvin Waters.(Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8204526) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(bnw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
