Kasbah Corp. Limited v. DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC et al
Kasbah Corp. Limited |
DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC and DDR Corp. |
1:2018cv04755 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
John K Larkins |
Amy Totenberg |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FILED IN ERROR ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/27/2018. (jtj) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER APPROVING #7 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. The time limits for adding parties, amending the pleadings, filing motions and discussing settlement are as stated in the JPRDP. However, although the parties have requested a discovery period of 8 months, the Court does not find, at this juncture, that such an overall period is warranted. As such, the parties are hereby permitted a period of 6 months to complete all discovery in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/27/2018. (jtj) |
Filing 9 NOTICE Of Filing Certificate of Compliance by Kasbah Corp. Limited (Piercy, William) |
Notification of Docket Correction re #11 Order. The Order was filed in error. Filing restricted. (jtj) |
Filing 8 Initial Disclosures by Kasbah Corp. Limited.(Piercy, William) |
Filing 7 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by DDR Corp., DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC. (jtj) |
Submission of #7 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan, to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (jtj) |
Filing 6 Initial Disclosures by DDR Corp., DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC.(Bundschuh, Ross) |
Filing 5 REDOCKETED AT #7 Joint Detailed Discovery Plan by DDR Corp., DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC. (Bundschuh, Ross) |
Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER to #3 Counterclaim by Kasbah Corp. Limited. (Piercy, William) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint (contained within NOTICE OF REMOVAL). Discovery ends on 3/21/2019. COUNTERCLAIM against Kasbah Corp. Limited by DDR Corp., DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Bundschuh, Ross) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/22/18. (ddm) |
Notification of Docket Correction: Magistrate Judge Larkins referred in error for a commercial eviction. (aar) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by DDR Corp. and DDR Southeast Sandy Plains, LLC. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113E-8205821) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit -B - Affidavit of Eric Cotton, #3 Exhibit -C - Notice of Filing, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.