Cox v. R.J. Schinner Co., Inc.
Russell Cox |
R.J. Schinner Co., Inc. |
1:2018cv04794 |
October 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Hillary Lynn Freesmeier on behalf of R.J. Schinner Co., Inc. (Freesmeier, Hillary) |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons by Russell Cox. (Roberts, Victor) |
Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by R.J. Schinner Co., Inc.. Discovery ends on 4/26/2019.(Mocek, Joyce) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. Modified to add jury demand on 11/28/2018 (bdb). |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have through and including November 27, 2018, in which to file its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 11/13/2018. (jtj) |
Submission of #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (jtj) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by R.J. Schinner Co., Inc.. (Mocek, Joyce) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Russell Cox. R.J. Schinner Co., Inc. served on 10/23/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (Roberts, Victor) |
Filing 4 NOTICE REGARDING FLSA CASES: In the event that a settlement is reached, the parties are DIRECTED to file a joint Motion for Approval of the Settlement Agreement. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/22/18. (ddm) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 10/22/18. (ddm) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to R.J. Schinner Co., Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Russell Cox. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8210716) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. R.J. Schinner Co., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: R.J. Schinner Co., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Hillary Lynn Freesmeier |
Represented By: | Joyce F. Mocek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Russell Cox | |
Represented By: | Victor Severin Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.