Barry v. Nielsen et al
Plaintiff: Nene Oumou Barry
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle and Lee Cissna
Case Number: 1:2018cv04917
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Michael L Brown
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting Defendants' #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, up to and including 2/26/2019, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Original Complaint for Writ of Mandamus and Declaratory Relief. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 12/21/2018. (bgt)
December 21, 2018 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time File Responsive Pleading with Brief In Support by Lee Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle. (Coty, Darcy)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 11/26/2018. (bgt)
October 26, 2018 Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Nene Oumou Barry. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 10/25/18. (ddm)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Sessions)(adg)
October 25, 2018 Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kevin Riddle. (adg)
October 25, 2018 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Cissna. (adg)
October 25, 2018 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kirstjen Nielsen. (adg)
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nene Oumou Barry. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8229583) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barry v. Nielsen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen
Represented By: Darcy F. Coty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Riddle
Represented By: Darcy F. Coty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee Cissna
Represented By: Darcy F. Coty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nene Oumou Barry
Represented By: H. Glenn Fogle, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?