Sockeye Licensing TX LLC, v. Hisense USA Corporation
| Sockeye Licensing TX LLC, |
| Hisense USA Corporation |
| 1:2018cv05129 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Hisense USA Corporationwith Jury Demand filed by Sockeye Licensing TX LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Pat No 9,547,981, #2 Exhibit B - US Pat No 8,135,342, #3 Exhibit C - Nokia N92 Wikipedia Page, #4 Exhibit D - Nolia N92 Blog Post, #5 Exhibit E - Nokia Article, #6 Exhibit F - 2011 Amendment, #7 Exhibit G - 2012 Amendment, #8 Exhibit H - Declaration of Michael Harold, #9 Exhibit I - Sept 9, 2016 Amendment, #10 Exhibit J - Hisense User Manual, #11 Exhibit K - Hisense User Manual, #12 Exhibit L - Hisense User Manual)(Kent, Daniel) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/8/2018. (btql)
|
| Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (rlb) |
| Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons, reviewed and approved by LMM. (rvb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Hisense USA Corporation. (rlb) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sockeye Licensing TX LLC. (rlb) Modified on 11/8/2018 to edit text (rlb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Sockeye Licensing TX LLC,. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8258704) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Pat No 9,547,981, #2 Exhibit B - US Pat No 8,135,342, #3 Exhibit C - Nokia N92 Wikipedia Page, #4 Exhibit D - Nolia N92 Blog Post, #5 Exhibit E - Nokia Article, #6 Exhibit F - 2011 Amendment, #7 Exhibit G - 2012 Amendment, #8 Exhibit H - Declaration of Michael Harold, #9 Exhibit I - Sept 9, 2016 Amendment, #10 Exhibit J - Hisense User Manual, #11 Exhibit K - Hisense User Manual, #12 Exhibit L - Hisense User Manual, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(rlb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sockeye Licensing TX LLC, v. Hisense USA Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hisense USA Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sockeye Licensing TX LLC, | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Arthur Kent |
| Represented By: | Isaac P. Rabicoff |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Matuszewski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
