Addaquay v. Nationstar Mortgage et al
| Thomas Addaquay |
| Bank of New York Mellon, Fulton County Superior Court, Antonio Johnson, Robert O. Scott, Craig R. Schwall, Fulton County Marshal, Nationstar Mortgage, Fulton County Magistrate Court, BNY and Mr. Cooper |
| 1:2018cv05370 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Richard W Story |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28:l332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Thomas Addaquay to 3050 Stonegate Drive, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30324 per chambers (see address listed in doc#1-1 civil cover sheet) re #2 Preliminary Injunction, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Resetting submission deadlines. (rsg) |
| Submission of #4 MOTION to Dismiss , #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings of State Defendants, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (rsg) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw Deborah Nolan Gore as Attorneyby Craig R. Schwall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gore, Deborah) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. RTS. Not deliverable as addressed. Mail sent to Thomas Addaquay re Clerks Certificate of Re-Mailing. (bdb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings of State Defendants with Brief In Support by Fulton County Superior Court, Craig R. Schwall. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Gore, Deborah) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Fulton County Magistrate Court, Fulton County Superior Court. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of Chief Magistrate Judge Cassandra Kirk)(Fattahi, Parsa) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief In Support by Fulton County Superior Court, Craig R. Schwall. (Attachments: #1 Brief In Support)(Gore, Deborah) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Re-Mailing as to Thomas Addaquay re #2 Order and #3 Mail Returned. (bdb) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Thomas Addaquay re #2 Order. Incorrect zip code. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Thomas Addaquay re #2 Preliminary Injunction, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. (rsg) |
Filing 2
ORDER: Having reviewed the Complaint and the allegations therein, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success of any of the claims. Accordingly, to the extent Plaintiff may seek injunctive relief, Plaintiffs Motion [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED. Pursuant to this Court's Standing Order No. 14-01, this case is REFERRED to the next available Magistrate Judge for hearing and determining pretrial matters pending before the Court. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 11/28/2018. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas (rsg)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Injunction Against Wrongful Nonjudicial Foreclosure & Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Consolidated) with Jury Demand filed by Thomas Addaquay. (Filing fee payment $312.00, receipt number 100108048) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 88.00, receipt number 100108047 (adg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
