Rowe v. Suntrust Bank Mortgage, Inc. et al
Suntrust Bank Mortgage, Inc. and Nancy J. Whaley |
Leonard Rowe |
1:2018cv05436 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Richard W Story |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #3 Order on IFP, to District Judge Richard W. Story. (rsg) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Appellant to either pay the fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within fourteen days. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 01/03/2019. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Leonard Rowe re #3 Order. (rsg) |
Filing 2 BANKRUPTCY RECORD RECEIVED (Attachments: No Designated items filed #1 Doc31-Motion re:appeal, #2 Doc35-Order)(Lugo, Yahaira) |
Submission of #1 Bankruptcy Notice of Appeal for Fee determination, to District Judge Richard W. Story. (eop) |
Filing 1 Bankruptcy Notice of Appeal, USBC Case#: 18-58913-JWC, filed by Leonard Rowe. Notice of Appeal filed 11/28/18 from Order entered 11/14/18 by Appellant Leonard Rowe. Fee Paid: No. (Attachments: #1 Doc. 27 - NOA, #2 Doc. 25 - Order, #3 Docket Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.