Akiri et al v. Nielsen et al
| Tonjsyanikki Jackson and Clement Obukowho Akiri |
| Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle and Lee Cissna |
| 1:2018cv05507 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Clarence Cooper |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Administrative Order Staying Civil Proceedings in Light of Lapse of Appropriations. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/26/2018. (dob)
|
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Clement Obukowho Akiri, Tonjsyanikki Jackson. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Cissna, Kirstjen Nielsen, Kevin Riddle, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Cissna, #2 Summons Nielsen, #3 Summons Riddle, #4 Summons Whitaker)(bnp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Clement Obukowho Akiri, Tonjsyanikki Jackson. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8308342) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX1, #2 Exhibit EX2, #3 Exhibit EX3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
