Hill v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
| Lee Quincy Hill, III |
| Unnamed Defendant(s) |
| 1:2018cv05597 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT : it is Ordered and Adjudged that the action be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to pursue relief in the proper court. (bnw)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the #2 Final Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's #1 action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to pursue relief in the proper court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 1/7/19. (bnw)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Lee Quincy Hill, III re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment,. (bnw) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bnw) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief, filed by Lee Quincy Hill, III, to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (bnw) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 12/12/2018. (btql)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff pursuing relief in those courts. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 12/12/2018. (btql) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Lee Quincy Hill, III re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (btql) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for Mandamus Relief for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Lee Quincy Hill, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. Unnamed Defendant(s) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unnamed Defendant(s) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lee Quincy Hill, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
