Cobble v. U.S. Government
| Daniel Eric Cobble |
| U.S. Government |
| 1:2018cv05674 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (jpa)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Daniel Eric Cobble re #7 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #8 Clerk's Judgment. (jpa) |
Filing 7
ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 2/5/19. (jpa)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (jpa) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpa) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. (rlb) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #3 Report and Recommendation filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. (rlb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Daniel Eric Cobble re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (jpa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/20/18. (jpa)
|
| Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/20/18. (jpa) |
|
(Found in #3 R&R) ORDER denying #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/20/18. (jpa)
|
| Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (bnp) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Eric Cobble. (bnp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (PETITION FOR ASYLUM) filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cobble v. U.S. Government | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Government | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Eric Cobble | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
