Progress Residential Borrower 1 LLC v. Spratling et al
Plaintiff: Progress Residential Borrower 1 LLC
Defendant: Fred Freeman, III and Sarah Spratling
Case Number: 1:2018cv05772
Filed: December 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Catherine M Salinas
Referring Judge: Thomas W Thrash
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2019 Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. (sap)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Final Report and Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Final Report and Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 1/2/2019. (sap)
January 2, 2019 Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this action be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Douglas County, Georgia for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 1/2/2019. (sap)
January 2, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Fred Freeman, III and Sarah Spratling. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
January 2, 2019 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Fred Freeman, III and Sarah Spratling re #3 Final Report and Recommendation and #4 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (sap)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER GRANTING the Defendant's #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 1/2/2019 in the #3 Final Report and Recommendation. (sap)
December 20, 2018 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (btql)
December 18, 2018 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fred Freeman, III. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(btql)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Progress Residential Borrower 1 LLC v. Spratling et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Progress Residential Borrower 1 LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth Cruikshank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Freeman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarah Spratling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?