Parson v. Commissioner, Social Secuirty Adminstration
| Kenith Nelson Parson |
| Commissioner, Social Secuirty Adminstration |
| 1:2018cv05800 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Administrative Order Staying Civil Proceedings in Light of Lapse Appropriations. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/26/2018. (tcc)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - The application to proceed in forma pauperis with accompanying documents, [Doc. #1 ], having been read and considered, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of filing fees, service costs or any costs of court as it appears that plaintiff Kenith P. ("plaintiff") is without sufficient funds to pay the fees and costs of this action and still provide for the necessities of life. As plaintiff is represented by counsel, the Court DIRECTS that plaintiff's counsel arrange for the service of process on the Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 12/21/2018. (tcc)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Kenith Nelson Parson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (ddm) |
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:18-cv-5800-RGV. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (ddm) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for consideration, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (usw) |
| CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Kenith Nelson Parson. (Blakeney, Walter) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenith Nelson Parson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(usw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parson v. Commissioner, Social Secuirty Adminstration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenith Nelson Parson | |
| Represented By: | Walter A. Blakeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner, Social Secuirty Adminstration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
