Stewart v. Amazon.com, LLC et al
| Kyle Stewart |
| On the Go Express, LLC, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, LLC |
| 1:2018cv05807 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(i) (bnp) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bnp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Kyle Stewart (Drake, E.) |
| RETURN of #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8352844) to attorney for correction re: courts and local counsel. (pmb) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number 113E-8352844)by Kyle Stewart. (Schalman-Bergen, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to On the Go Express, LLC. (bnp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kyle Stewart. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8339301) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stewart Opt In Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
