Leverett v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
Cameron Lamonte Leverett |
Macys.com, LLC (Ohio) and Experian Information Solutions, Inc |
1:2018cv05896 |
December 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
William M Ray |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement Macys.com, LLC (Ohio) by Cameron Lamonte Leverett (Klein, Adam) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cameron Lamonte Leverett. Experian Information Solutions, Inc waiver mailed on 12/28/2018, answer due 2/26/2019. (Klein, Adam) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Cameron Lamonte Leverett. Macys.com, LLC (Ohio) waiver mailed on 12/28/2018, answer due 2/26/2019. (Klein, Adam) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Cameron Lamonte Leverett. (Klein, Adam) |
Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons - OK per WMR (sll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8353787) filed by Cameron Lamonte Leverett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(usw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.