Lofton v. Kilgore et al
| Daniel Eugene Lofton |
| Officer Kilgore and Kevin Sprayberry |
| 1:2019cv00134 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Janet F King |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this case and all filings therein be TRANSFERRED to the Rome Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King on 2/1/2019. (rjs)
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Northern District of Georgia, Rome Division, new case number 4:19-CV-20-HLM-WEJ. Original file mailed to Rome. (rjs) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Daniel Eugene Lofton re #3 Order. (rjs) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. (bnw) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Daniel Eugene Lofton. (bnw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Daniel Eugene Lofton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
