Chlorking Mexico LLC v. Nielsen et al
Chlorking Mexico LLC |
Kirstejen Nielsen, Lee Cissna and Gregory A. Richardson |
1:2019cv00234 |
January 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Amy Totenberg |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Administrative Order Staying Civil Proceedings in Light of Lapse of Appropriations. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/26/18. (jdb) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Guidelines to Parties and Counsel in Cases Proceeding Before The Honorable Amy Totenberg. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 1/22/19. (jpa) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Chlorking Mexico LLC. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Cissna, Kirstejen Nielsen, Gregory A. Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Summons Whitaker, #2 Summons Pak, #3 Summons Nielsen, #4 Summons Cissna)(bnw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Chlorking Mexico LLC.(Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113E-8381468) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex1, #3 Exhibit Ex2, #4 Exhibit Ex3, #5 Exhibit Ex4, #6 Exhibit Ex5, #7 Exhibit Ex6)(bnw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 1/15/2019 to edit file date(bnw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.