Whitaker v. Sprayberry et al
Michael Whitaker |
Mrs. Hammock-Evans, Mrs. Manning, Dr. Eugene, Mrs. Cleary, Mrs. Stanley and Kevin Sprayberry |
1:2019cv00291 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this action be TRANSFERRED to the Rome Division for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 1/24/19. (bnw) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Michael Whitaker re #3 Order. (bnw) |
Intradistrict Transfer to Rome, new case number 4:19-cv-16-HLM, Assigned to Judge Harold L. Murphy. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and certified copy of docket sent. (bnw) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Michael Whitaker. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.