Muhammad v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, USA et al
| Ali S. Muhammad |
| Jamie Dimon, Rubin Lublin, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Wargo French, LLP, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, USA |
| 1:2019cv00417 |
| January 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Michael L Brown |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jta) |
| Submission of #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jta) |
| Submission of #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rubin Lublin, LLC, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jta) |
| Submission of #12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rubin Lublin, LLC filed by Rubin Lublin, LLC, to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jta) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay. The deadline for the parties to participate in a Rule 26(f) conference is STAYED until fourteen (14) days after the date the last Defendant is required to file an answer. The parties obligations to serve initial disclosures, to file the joint preliminary report and discovery plan, and to participate in discovery are STAYED until thirty (30) days after the date the last Defendant is required to file an answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 3/5/19. (jpa)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER for Service of #12 Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/25/2019. (rlb)
|
| Filing 12 NON-FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Rubin Lubin's Motion to Dismiss #5 be GRANTED and that all of the Plaintiffs claims against Rubin Lublin be DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/25/2019. (rlb) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: For good cause shown, the Motion to Strike and Replace #2 is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE both parts of the provisionally sealed, originally filed copy of Exhibit B [1-5][1-6] and replace those files with the Amended Exhibit B [2-1]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/25/2019. (rlb)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Certain Pretrial and Discovery Deadlines with Brief In Support by Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase Bank, USA. (Attachments: #1 Brief)(Hansen, Brian) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase Bank, USA. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(Hansen, Brian) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Wargo French, LLP. (McGinnis, Shanon) Modified on 2/15/2019 to edit text (rlb). |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Wargo French, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint)(McGinnis, Shanon) |
| Filing 6 (Correspondence construed by clerk as) RESPONSE to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rubin Lublin, LLC filed by Ali S. Muhammad. (rlb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rubin Lublin, LLC by Rubin Lublin, LLC. (Chaness, Bret) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' Answers are due 2/14/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 1/28/19. (jpa)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Wargo French, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(McGinnis, Shanon) |
| Submission of #2 MOTION to Strike Exhibit B to #1 Notice of Removal, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (cmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Strike Exhibit B to the #1 Notice of Removal and Replace it With Amended Exhibit B by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Wargo French, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Amended Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(cmd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Wargo French, LLP, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8406059) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(cmd) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/25/2019) (jdb). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/25/2019: ---STRUCK FROM RECORD PURSUANT TO ORDER #11 --- #5 PROVISIONALLY FILED UNDER SEAL-- Exhibit B part 1, ---STRUCK FROM RECORD PURSUANT TO ORDER #11 --- #6 PROVISIONALLY FILED UNDER SEAL-- Exhibit B part 2) (jdb). Modified on 2/25/2019 (rlb). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/25/2019: #7 Exhibit Amended Exhibit B) (rlb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
