Martey v. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
| Emmanuel Martey |
| Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc., John Does 1-100, Solco Healthcare US, LLC, Huahai U.S., Inc., Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc. doing business as Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC |
| 1:2019cv00475 |
| January 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CTO-1 from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Case to be transferred to the District of New Jersey for inclusion in MDL 2875 . (btql) Text modified on 2/25/2019 (btql). |
| New Civil Action Number in USDC NJ 1:19-cv-6836 (aar) |
| Case electrically transferred to District of New Jersey. (btql) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (btql) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 2/6/2019. (btql)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Emmanuel Martey. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8413720) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
