Culbert v. Beasley
| Robert Culbert |
| DeleTasha Beasley |
| 1:2019cv00589 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| John K Larkins |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation and REMANDING CASE to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County. There being no further issues before the Court, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 2/25/2019. (bdb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to DeleTasha Beasley and Robert Culbert re #5 Order. (bdb) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bdb) |
| Electronic mail re #5 Order and docket forwarded to Magistrate Court of Fulton County. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to DeleTasha Beasley, Robert Culbert re #4 Order for Service and #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal filed by DeleTasha Beasley. (bdb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 2/5/2019. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER and FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Approving Beasley's Application for leave to proceed IFP, and because it is clear that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the removal action, it is further RECOMMENDING that the case be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 2/5/2019. (bdb)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand by DeleTasha Beasley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 2/5/2019. (bdb)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (bnp) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeleTasha Beasley. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Culbert v. Beasley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Culbert | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DeleTasha Beasley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
