Ali v. Cissna et al
| Afsar Ali |
| Kevin Riddle, L. Francis Cissna and Kirstjen M. Nielsen |
| 1:2019cv00610 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kirstjen M. Nielsen. (eop) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Kevin Riddle. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to L. Francis Cissna. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Afsar Ali. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113E-8430669) (Attachments: #1 ex -A -USCIS Receipt I-130, #2 Ex -B -USCIS Receipt I-485, #3 Ex -C -Notice Interview, #4 Ex -D -Request for Evidence, #5 Ex -E -Notice of Intent, #6 Ex -F -Response to Intent to Deny, #7 Ex -G -Petitioner's Child Birth Cert, #8 Ex -H -Processing Times, #9 Ex -I -Letter to USCIS, #10 Ex -J -ALIA Inquiry to USCIS, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
