Faison et al v. Ratliff et al
Plaintiff: Mary Faison, Ke'osha Avery and Craig Faison
Defendant: Walmart Stores East, L.P. and Clinton W. Ratliff
Case Number: 1:2019cv00814
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William M Ray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons Proof of Service, as to Clinton W. Ratliff. (Batson, John)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Extension of Time to Answer, Move, Object or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that the time in which the Defendant may answer,move, object or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through and including April 19, 2019. Signed by Judge William M Ray, II on 3/27/2019. re #5 (rlb)
March 27, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Answer, Object or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Comlaint by Walmart Stores East, L.P.. (Hill, Robert)
March 27, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Benjamin Hill on behalf of Walmart Stores East, L.P. (Hill, Robert)
February 15, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Craig Faison, Mary Faison and Ke'osha Avery. (eop)
February 15, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Clinton W. Ratliff. (eop)
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Craig Faison, Mary Faison and Ke'osha Avery. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8455365) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summon(s) -2)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faison et al v. Ratliff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Stores East, L.P.
Represented By: Robert Benjamin Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clinton W. Ratliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Faison
Represented By: John Paul Batson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ke'osha Avery
Represented By: John Paul Batson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Faison
Represented By: John Paul Batson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?