Coleman v. Reynnells et al
| Vernon Marcus Coleman |
| Micheal Dewald and James Reynnells |
| 1:2019cv00851 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Orinda D Evans |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #5 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint, and #7 MOTION for Summary Judgment, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Re-Mailing as to Vernon Marcus Coleman re #3 Order, Authorization and Affidavit form and a standard 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil action form (with Instructions) form, to defendant's new address at Jesup, FCI. (bdb) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Vernon Marcus Coleman. (bdb) --Please refer to http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain the Notice to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion form contained on the Court's website.-- |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Micheal Dewald, James Reynnells filed by Vernon Marcus Coleman.(bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint by Vernon Marcus Coleman. (bdb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Vernon Marcus Coleman re #4 Mail Returned, \ #3 Order, Complaint and Affidavit to USP, Atlanta. (bdb) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. RTS from Deyton Detention. Mail sent to Vernon Marcus Coleman re #3 Order, Complaint and affidavit forms.(bdb) |
Filing 3
ORDER: The Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit an amended complaint within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the entry date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must, also within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this order, either submit the full filing and administrative fee of $400.00, or execute and return a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to forward the a standard 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil action form and the appropriate financial affidavit to plaintiff, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the assigned Magistrate Judge upon receipt of the amended complaint and full filing and administrative fee or affidavit, or at the expiration of the time period noted above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 3/4/2019. (sap)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Vernon Marcus Coleman re #3 Order, a standard 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil action form (with Instructions), and an Affidavit and Authorization form. (sap) |
| Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (eop) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for Review, to District Judge Orinda D. Evans. (eop) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Vernon Marcus Coleman. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Vernon Marcus Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
