Ivey et al v. Mann et al
| Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey |
| Jeffrey Mann, Police Officer Landry, Gary Piper, Chief of Police James W. Conroy and Police Officer Kolwalski |
| 1:2019cv00872 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #9 MOTION to Recuse Thrash, May, Pannell, Baverman, Salinas to District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. (sap) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Recuse Thrash, May, Pannell, Baverman, Salinas by Marcus D. Ivey, Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. (sap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE Of Filing Notice of Removal from Dekalb Superior Court (18-cr-2778) by Marcus D. Ivey (sap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE Of Filing Notice of Removal from Dekalb Superior Court (19-cr-1407) by Marcus D. Ivey (sap) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Marcus D. Ivey and Marvis McDaniel-Ivey re #5 Final Report and Recommendation and #6 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (sap) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Service of #5 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Final Report and Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Final Report and Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 3/21/2019. (sap)
|
| Filing 5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and that a Certificate of Appealability be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 3/21/2019. (sap) |
|
ORDER DENYING the Plaintiffs' #2 Motion for Reconsideration and #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 3/21/2019 in the #5 Final Report and Recommendation. (sap)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Marcus D. Ivey, Marvis McDaniel-Ivey re #4 Order Reassigning Case. (btql) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. As a matter of judicial economy, this Court ORDERS that the instant civil action be TRANSFERRED to the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to assign the undersigned the next case assignment in rotation for Judge Thrash. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:19-cv-00872-TWT-CMS. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 2/27/2019. (btql)
|
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (btql) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Marcus D. Ivey, Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. (btql) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Reconsideration and Service by Marcus D. Ivey, Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. (btql) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marcus D. Ivey, Marvis McDaniel-Ivey. ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number GAN100110370 ) (Attachments: #1 Rule/NISI, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(btql) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
