SynchView Technologies, LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: SynchView Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Cox Communications, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv00931
Filed: February 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cox Communications, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Cox Enterprises Inc. for Cox Communications, Inc.. (Nichols, Alan)
April 22, 2019 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Cox Communications, Inc.. Discovery ends on 1/17/2020.(Nichols, Alan) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
April 15, 2019 Filing 8 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES.(pdw)
April 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Cox Communications, Inc. Answer due 4/22/2019. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 4/8/2019. (rjs)
April 5, 2019 Submission of #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rjs)
March 16, 2019 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, for Defendant, filed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kent, Daniel)
March 7, 2019 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. Cox Communications, Inc. served on 3/1/2019, answer due 3/22/2019. (Kent, Daniel)
February 26, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SynchView Technologies, LLC identifying Other Affiliate, Intelleq Holdings, LLC for SynchView Technologies, LLC.(eop)
February 26, 2019 Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (eop)
February 26, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Cox Communications, Inc.. (eop)
February 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 113E-8475610) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -US Pat No 6,788,882, #2 Exhibit -B -Claim Chart - Motorola DCT6412DVR, #3 Exhibit -C -Claim Chart -Cisco 8642 DVR, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SynchView Technologies, LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SynchView Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Cortney Scott Alexander
Represented By: Daniel Arthur Kent
Represented By: Stephen Robert Risley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Alan Shane Nichols
Represented By: Nah Eun Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?