Taylor v. Smith
Petitioner: Harry Brett Taylor
Respondent: Amiee Smith
Case Number: 1:2019cv01546
Filed: April 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Charles A Pannell
Referring Judge: Catherine M Salinas
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Submission of #2 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition and #5 Response to Habeas Petition, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (bdb)
July 10, 2019 Filing 5 ANSWER- RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Amiee Smith. (Attachments: #1 Brief in support of answer-response)(Crowder, Matthew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
June 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula K. Smith on behalf of Amiee Smith (Smith, Paula)
June 18, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Blackwell Crowder on behalf of Amiee Smith (Crowder, Matthew)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing Clerk to perfect service of petition and order on respondent by certified mail, with copy to State Attorney General. Respondent is directed to show cause within 30 days of receipt of order why writ should not be granted. Petitioner is DIRECTED that, if he wishes to file a reply to Respondent's response, he must file his reply within twenty (20) days of his receipt of Respondent's response. Petitioner is ADVISED that during the pendency of his case he must keep the Clerk of Court advised of his address at all times and that his failure to do so may result in dismissal of his petition. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO RESUBMIT this action to the assigned Magistrate Judge within twenty days of Respondent filing a response or, if Respondent fails to file a response, at the expiration of his time for doing so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 6/6/2019. (tcc)
June 6, 2019 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Amiee Smith (CMRR 91 7199 9991 7032 5717 7111) and the Attorney General of Georgia (CMRR 91 7199 9991 7032 5717 7104) re #2 Order Directing Clerk to Perfect Service of HC Petition, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (tcc)
April 5, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Harry Brett Taylor. ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 113E-8561181.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/8/2019: #2 brief in support) (tmf).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Amiee Smith
Represented By: Paula K. Smith
Represented By: Matthew Blackwell Crowder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harry Brett Taylor
Represented By: McNeill Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?