Guillen v. Equifax, Inc.
| Samuel Anthony Guillen |
| Equifax, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv01580 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. for inclusion with the other related cases in the Consumer Track of the MDL, In re: Equifax Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1:17-MD-2800-TWT. Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:19-cv-1580-TWT. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 6/26/19. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Samuel Anthony Guillen re #8 Order Reassigning Case. (klb) |
| Civil Case Terminated per order entered 6/26/19. Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson terminated from case. (klb) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE re #6 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Notice of Stay of Proceedings filed by Equifax, Inc.. (Griest, Robert) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Samuel Anthony Guillen. (Attachments: #1 Memoradum In Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(tcc) --Please refer to http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain the Notice to Respond to Summary Judgment Motion form contained on the Court's website.-- |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Equifax, Inc. of Potential IntraDistrict Tag-Along Action (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Griest, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Douglas Griest on behalf of Equifax, Inc. (Griest, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Samuel Anthony Guillen. Equifax, Inc. served on 5/2/2019, answer due 5/23/2019. (tcc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Equifax, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Samuel Anthony Guillen. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number GAN100111657) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guillen v. Equifax, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Samuel Anthony Guillen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Douglas Griest |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
