Cheatham v. United States Department of Education et al
| Matthew Cheatham |
| Betsy Devos and United States Department of Education |
| 1:2019cv01656 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, Betsy Devos's and United States Department of Education's Answers due 7/24/2019. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 6/24/2019. (tcc)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by United States Department of Education. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Williams, Melaine) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Matthew Cheatham. All Defendants. (Armor, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Betsy Devos, United States Department of Education. (Attachments: #1 Summons Betsy Devos)(tmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Matthew Cheatham. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8573766) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
