Waever et al v. Henkel & Mccoy, Inc. et al
| Lola Mae Weaver and Rudy Eugene Weaver |
| Henkel & Mccoy, Inc. and Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01815 |
| April 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Court's Notice Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES.(pdw) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Henkel & Mccoy, Inc..(Bibbins, Walter) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company, LLC. Discovery ends on 9/27/2019.(Koenig, George) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Rudy Eugene Weaver and Lola Mae Weaver. (Filing fee $400 receipt number AGANDC-8613833) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sap) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
