Payne v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Marlo Payne |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and Automobile Acceptance Corporation |
1:2019cv01870 |
April 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
Jean-Paul Boulee |
Thomas W Thrash |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Reassigned to Honorable Jean-Paul Boulee. Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:19-cv-01870-JPB-CCB. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (sap) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Automobile Acceptance Corporation. (tcc) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Trans Union, LLC. (tcc) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (tcc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Marlo Payne. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8620565) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.