Delapanha v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC
| Kevin Delapanha |
| Cardinal Health 200, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01976 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement/Certificate of Interested Persons by Cardinal Health 200, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Cardinal Health Inc. for Cardinal Health 200, LLC by Cardinal Health 200, LLC. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cardinal Health 200, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Cardinal Health Inc. for Cardinal Health 200, LLC by Cardinal Health 200, LLC.(Smith, Mary) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Cardinal Health 200, LLC. Discovery ends on 11/8/2019.(Smith, Mary) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Cardinal Health 200, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Mary) |
ORDER by docket entry only GRANTING #6 Consent Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Cardinal Health 200, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through 6/11/2019. SO ORDERED by United States Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 5/20/2019. (sal)
|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Kevin Delapanha. Cardinal Health 200, LLC served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Bachman, Charles) |
| Clerks Notation re #3 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosures by Kevin Delapanha. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Cardinal Health 200, LLC. (jpa) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by Kevin Delapanha. (Bachman, Charles) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Kevin Delapanha (Bachman, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8632770) filed by Kevin Delapanha. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rjs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Delapanha v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cardinal Health 200, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Mary Claire Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Delapanha | |
| Represented By: | Charles L. Bachman, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
