Cooper v. Department of the Treasury et al
| Garth Cooper |
| Department of the Treasury, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2019cv02056 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Garth Cooper. Internal Revenue Service served on 5/13/2019, answer due 7/12/2019. (jdb) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Garth Cooper. Department of the Treasury served on 5/13/2019, answer due 7/12/2019. (jdb) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Garth Cooper. Commissioner of Internal Revenue served on 5/13/2019, answer due 7/12/2019. (jdb) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Department of the Treasury. (tcc) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Internal Revenue. (tcc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Internal Revenue Service. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Garth Cooper. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 112353) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cmd) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
