REDFORD v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA et al
MIKE REDFORD |
JUDGE CLARENCE COOPER, Justice Eleanor L. Ross, Therese S. Barnes, Supreme Court of Georgia, United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, TIA C HULTON and James N Hatten |
1:2019cv02308 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Michael L Brown |
Janet F King |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 OBJECTIONS to #12 Final Report and Recommendation filed by MIKE REDFORD. (bjh) |
Submission of #12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #7 Complaint, #8 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Petition, to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (bjh) |
Filing 13 ORDER for Service of #12 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King on 6/3/2019. (dob) |
Filing 12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending #8 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MIKE REDFORD, and #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MIKE REDFORD be denied and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MIKE REDFORD; #7 Complaint, filed by MIKE REDFORD, be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King on 6/3/2019. (dob) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to MIKE REDFORD re #12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #7 Complaint, filed by MIKE REDFORD, #8 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MIKE REDFORD, #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MIKE REDFORD, #1 Petition fo, #13 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation,. (dob) |
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Convert this action to an action under 1983; denying as moot #6 Motion Not to Dismiss his Complaint as found in #12 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janet F. King on 6/3/2019. (dob) |
Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 5:19-cv-00098. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Motion to not dismiss #6 , motion for leave to proceed IFP #8 , motion for leave to proceed IFP #2 , motion to convert case to 42:1983pr #5 , to Magistrate Judge Janet F. King. (aar) |
Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Nothern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**(Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 6/5/2019.) (ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 10 ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings and the remaining pending motions to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 05/21/2019. (chc) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 9 Letter from AUSA Bernard Snell to Mike Redford regarding insufficient service of process re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 7 RECAST COMPLAINT against CLARENCE COOPER, JAMES N HATTEN, ELEANOR L ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, THERESE S BARNES, TIA C HULTON, filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint, #2 Envelope)(ggs) Modified on 5/21/2019 (ggs). [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 6 MOTION Not to Dismiss Complaint if IFP was Denied Filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 5 MOTION to Convert Habeas Petition to a 42:1983 action re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) Modified on 5/6/2019 to edit docket text. (ggs). [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 4 ORDER to Recast his pleading on the appropriate form within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 04/22/19. (ans) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, filed by MIKE REDFORD. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Additional Facts, #2 Envelope)(ggs) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 5/22/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.