Tyler v. Amtrak, Amtrak
Plaintiff: Kerric Tyler
Defendant: Amtrak, Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv02426
Filed: May 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak's First Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents To Plaintiff by Amtrak, Amtrak.(Golden, Peter)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #5 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 6/28/2019. (bnp)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Amtrak, Amtrak. (Golden, Peter)
June 26, 2019 Submission of #5 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (bnp)
June 4, 2019 Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amtrak, Amtrak. Discovery ends on 11/1/2019.(Golden, Peter) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II (J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 06/03/2019. (aaq)
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amtrak identifying Other Affiliate Washington Terminal Company, Other Affiliate Chicago Union Company, Other Affiliate Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, Other Affiliate Penn Station Leasing for Amtrak, Amtrak. (tmf)
May 28, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Amtrak. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-8689201) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tyler v. Amtrak, Amtrak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amtrak, Amtrak
Represented By: Peter G. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Peter G. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerric Tyler
Represented By: Mark D. Link
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?