RideApp, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: RideApp, Inc.
Defendant: Social Bicycles, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv02507
Filed: May 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Michael L Brown
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2019 Filing 8 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (jta)
June 3, 2019 Filing 7 PROPOSED AO 120 . (Stockwell, Mitchell)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Before the Court are Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) and Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Dkt. #4 ). Local Rule 5.1C requires that all "[p]leadings, motions, and other documents presented to the court for filing must... be prepared in one of the following fonts: Times New Roman (at least 14 point), Courier New (at least 12 point), Century Schoolbook (at least 13 point), or Book Antigua (at least 13 point)." These filings are written in 12 point, Times New Roman font. The Court NOTIFIES the parties that the Court may STRIKE and not consider any future filings that do not comply with the format requirements of the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 6/3/2019. (bgt)
June 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 11/26/2018. (bgt)
June 3, 2019 Notice of deficiency re AO Form 120. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 120. See LR 3.4 and LPR 1.4. Docket the form using the event AO 120, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (eop)
May 31, 2019 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by RideApp, Inc.. (eop)
May 31, 2019 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Social Bicycles, LLC. (eop)
May 31, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc.. (eop)
May 31, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by RideApp, Inc.. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-8698176) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Exhibit -C, #4 Exhibit -D, #5 Exhibit -E, #6 Exhibit -F, #7 Exhibit -G, #8 Exhibit -H, #9 Exhibit -I, #10 Exhibit -J, #11 Exhibit -K, #12 Exhibit -L, #13 Exhibit -M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RideApp, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Bicycles, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RideApp, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Nicole Brouillette
Represented By: David Alan Reed
Represented By: Mitchell Gaines Stockwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?