McClure v. AT&T Inc. et al
Bobby G. McClure |
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp. |
1:2019cv02551 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Catherine M Salinas |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Request for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): 2/27/20-3/10/20, by Kristine Orr Brown. (Brown, Kristine) |
Filing 11 ORDER Denying as Moot #10 Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Arbitration. The Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to administratively close this case pending completion of the alternative dispute resolution process agreed to by the parties. Should additional proceedings in this Court become necessary, either party may file a motion to reopen the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 12/13/19. (bjh) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas terminated from case. (bjh) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Arbitration with Brief In Support by Bobby G. McClure. (Brown, Kristine) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Leroy Barnum on behalf of AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc. (Barnum, Eric) |
Filing 8 ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING #7 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer. For the reasons stated in the motion, the deadline for filing answers is now on or before December 11, 2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/27/2019. (drg) |
Notification of Docket Correction re #7 Second MOTION for Extension of Time For Defendants to File ResponsivePleadings re: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, . Pleading filed as multi part motion; should be single part motion. Clerk made necessary changes. (dob) |
Filing 7 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Bobby G. McClure. (Brown, Kristine) Modified on 11/27/2019 to edit text to reflect PDF (dob). |
Filing 6 ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING #5 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to file their answer or other responsive pleading. AT&T Corp.'s Answer is now due on or before 11/27/2019. AT&T Inc.'s Answer is also due on or before 11/27/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/25/2019. (drg) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint re: #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Bobby G. McClure. (Brown, Kristine) Modified on 10/25/2019 to edit event selected (dob). |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bobby G. McClure. AT&T Inc. waiver mailed on 8/28/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Brown, Kristine) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Bobby G. McClure. AT&T Corp. waiver mailed on 8/28/2019, answer due 10/28/2019. (Brown, Kristine) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons AT&T Inc.)(tmf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Bobby G. McClure. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8702956) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Redacted EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Redacted Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 6/5/2019 to correct date(tmf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.