SynchView Technologies, LLC v. Arris International Public Limited Company
| SynchView Technologies, LLC |
| Arris International Public Limited Company |
| 1:2019cv02726 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant must answer, move, or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended through and including September 9, 2019. Signed by Judge William M Ray, II on 7/31/19. (rlb)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, for Defendant, filed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kent, Daniel) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline by which Defendant must answer, move, or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through and including August 9, 2019. Signed by Judge William M Ray, II on 7/8/19. (rlb)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, filed on behalf of Defendant by SynchView Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kent, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. Arris International Public Limited Company served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. (Kent, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SynchView Technologies, LLC identifying Other Affiliate: Intelleq Holdings, LLC for SynchView Technologies, LLC. (eop) |
| Filing 3 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Arris International Public Limited Company. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by SynchView Technologies, LLC. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number AGANDC-8730592) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -US Pat No. 6,788,882, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Exhibit -C, #4 Exhibit -D, #5 Exhibit -E, #6 Exhibit -F, #7 Exhibit -G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SynchView Technologies, LLC v. Arris International Public Limited Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SynchView Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Cortney Scott Alexander |
| Represented By: | Daniel Arthur Kent |
| Represented By: | Stephen Robert Risley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arris International Public Limited Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
