Brown v. Clayton County Sheriff's Office et al
Marlon Brown |
Clayton County Board of Commisioners, Clayton County Sheriff's Office, John Does 1-10, Victor Hill, XYZ Corporations 1-10 and Officer Patrick Fluellen |
1:2019cv02731 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Amy Totenberg |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Clayton County Board of Commissioners, Clayton County Sheriff's Office, Patrick Fluellen, Victor Hill. (Attachments: #1 Summons Clayton County Sheriff's Office, #2 Summons Patrick Fluellen, #3 Summons Sheriff Victor Hill)(bnp) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Marlon Brown (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Reed, Amber) |
Remark : ONE E-SUMMONS FILED NOT ISSUED - MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS LISTED ON SUMMONS - ATTORNEY NOTIFIED TO FILE SEPARATE SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT (bnw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Marlon Brown.(Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8730945) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bnw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.