Cleveland v. RAC Acceptance East, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Phenica Clement Cleveland
Defendant: RAC Acceptance East, LLC and Byrider Finance, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv02993
Filed: June 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Alan J Baverman
Referring Judge: Leigh Martin May
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: While the Court notes that this is Byrider's second request for an extension, see Doc. #4 , the Court GRANTS the extension because it is unopposed and is for a relatively brief period. Accordingly, the Defendant shall have until August 27, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 8/12/2019. (tmf)
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Byrider Finance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Extend Time)(Breithaupt, Eric)
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Byrider Finance, LLC Answer due 8/13/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 7/19/2019. (adg)
July 16, 2019 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Byrider Finance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Breithaupt, Eric) Modified on 7/19/2019 (adg).
July 12, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Joseph Breithaupt on behalf of Byrider Finance, LLC (Breithaupt, Eric)
July 8, 2019 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons, reviewed and approved by LMM. (rvb)
July 3, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Phenica Clement Cleveland. (Klein, Adam)
July 3, 2019 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons. Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 07/03/2019. (cmb).
June 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Phenica Clement Cleveland. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8762986) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cleveland v. RAC Acceptance East, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAC Acceptance East, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Byrider Finance, LLC
Represented By: Eric Joseph Breithaupt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phenica Clement Cleveland
Represented By: Adam Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?