Patel v. Cuccinelli et al
| Mineshkumar Kantilal Patel |
| Sarah M. Kendall and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli |
| 1:2019cv03014 |
| June 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Mineshkumar Kantilal Patel. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lee Francis Cissna, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Attorney, U.S. Northern District of Georgia, #2 Summons United States Attorney General)(adg) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Sarah M. Kendall. (adg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-8764532) filed by Mineshkumar Kantilal Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
