Boone v. Saul,Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Sheila D. Boone |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv03207 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Michael L Brown |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Sheila D. Boone. Andrew Saul served on 8/22/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail return receipts)(Hogan, John) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Summons US Attorney, #2 Summons Attorney General)(jta) |
MINUTE ORDER re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to ISSUE electronic summonses to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 08/16/2019. (cmb)
|
| Submission of #2 Order, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (jta) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Sheila D. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(jta) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action shall therefore proceed as any other civil action. Under Rule 4(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court must order the United States Marshal to serve process when the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO FORWARD sufficient USM 285 Forms to Plaintiffs counsel. Because it appears that Plaintiffs counsel has already completed sufficient summonses, the Clerk need not forward blank summons forms to Plaintiffs counsel. On June 17, 2019, Andrew Saul was sworn in as the Commissioner of Social Security. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Saul is automatically substituted as a party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to amend the case style to reflect the substitution. Upon receipt, Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order, so that process may be served upon Defendant. Upon receipt of the forms by the Clerk, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshals Service service packages for Defendant. The service packages must include the USM 285 form, the summons, and one (1) copy of the complaint. Upon receipt of the service packages, the U.S. Marshals Service is DIRECTED to serve Defendant. The completed USM 285 forms shall be filed with the Clerk. If counsel for Plaintiff prefers, counsel may arrange for service of the complaint to Defendant without involving the U.S. Marshal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 7/22/19. (jta)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Sheila D. Boone re USM 285 Forms Sent. (jta) |
| Forms sent to party: USM 285 per #2 Order. (jta) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Sheila D. Boone. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summon(s) -3)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
