Lomax et al v. The Kroger Co. et al
Plaintiff: Cheryl Lomax and Michael Lomax
Defendant: The Kroger Co. and 720 Commerce Drive, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv03632
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Clarence Cooper
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs to make their initial disclosures and the parties to file their joint preliminary report and discovery plan within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order. Failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include the dismissal of the action or the striking of pleadings. See LR 16.5 and 41.3A(2), NDGa. Signed by Judge Clarence Cooper on 10/10/19. (jta)
October 8, 2019 Filing 5 First Initial Disclosures by The Kroger Co..(Wasick, Jeffrey)
September 24, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The Kroger Co..(Wasick, Jeffrey)
August 20, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons by The Kroger Co.. (Wasick, Jeffrey)
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by The Kroger Co.. Discovery ends on 1/9/2020. (Filed at state court and contained w/in #1 Notice of Removal).(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by The Kroger Co.. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-8857798) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lomax et al v. The Kroger Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Lomax
Represented By: James Micah Dickie
Represented By: Nicholas Prince Smith
Represented By: Andrew Mabon Beal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Lomax
Represented By: James Micah Dickie
Represented By: Nicholas Prince Smith
Represented By: Andrew Mabon Beal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Co.
Represented By: Matthew G. Moffett
Represented By: Jeffrey Mittar Wasick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 720 Commerce Drive, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?