Harris v. SunTrust Bank
Andrew P. Harris |
SunTrust Bank |
1:2019cv03866 |
August 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Catherine M Salinas |
Thomas W Thrash |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and #3 MOTION to Require Mortgage Payments to be Paid into Court to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (sap) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay Discovery. The pre-trial deadlines for all parties and the discovery period are stayed in this case until the Court enters an order ruling on Defendant's pending #2 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 9/23/2019. (sap) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Discovery and Suspend Rule 26 Disclosures and the Scheduling of Rule 26(F) Conference by SunTrust Bank. (Breithaupt, Eric) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Andrew P. Harris re #9 Order on Motion to Stay. (sap) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #3 MOTION to Require Mortgage Payments to be Paid into Court filed by Andrew P. Harris. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rlb) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Andrew P. Harris. (rlb) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Andrew P. Harris. (sap) |
Clerk's Notation re #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement: OK, per TWT. (cmd) |
Notification of Docket Correction re #4 Certificate of Interested and Corporate Disclosure Statement: SunTrust Banks, Inc. added as a corporate parent. (sap) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by SunTrust Bank identifying Corporate Parent SunTrust Bank Holding Company and Corporate Parent SunTrust Banks, Inc. for SunTrust Bank.(Breithaupt, Eric) Modified on 9/6/2019 to add a corporate parent (sap). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Require Mortgage Payments to be Paid into Court by SunTrust Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Breithaupt, Eric) |
Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by SunTrust Bank. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief)(Breithaupt, Eric) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by SunTrust Bank. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-8893870) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A with Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (bdb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harris v. SunTrust Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrew P. Harris | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SunTrust Bank | |
Represented By: | Eric Joseph Breithaupt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.