Robertson v. Saul
Plaintiff: Latoya Shanice Robertson
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv03938
Filed: September 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Alan J Baverman
Referring Judge: Mark H Cohen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Latoya Shanice Robertson. Andrew Saul served on 9/17/2019, answer due 12/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certified mail return receipts)(Hogan, John)
September 5, 2019 Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 US Attorney NDGa, #2 US Attorney General)(adg)
September 5, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Latoya Shanice Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(adg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action shall therefore proceed as any other civil action. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO FORWARD sufficient USM 285 Forms to Plaintiff's counsel. Counsel SHALL complete the forms and return them to the Clerk within 21 days of the date of this order. Upon receipt of forms, the Clerk is directed to prepare and forward a service package to the USM for service on the defendant(s). The U.S. Marshal's Service is DIRECTED to serve Defendant. The completed USM 285 forms shall be filed with the Clerk. The Clerk is DIRECTED also to ISSUE electronic summonses to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 9/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 USM285 form) c:Financial Office(adg)
September 4, 2019 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (tcc)
September 3, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Latoya Shanice Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Motion to File IFP, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Atty Gen, #5 Summons SS Commissioner, #6 Summons US Atty)(tcc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robertson v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Shanice Robertson
Represented By: John Vincent Hogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?